Roof Man Scan™

Are the roof and environmental conditions suitable for capturing meaningful thermal differences?

Scan™ plans thermal collection around construction, weather, solar loading, timing, and site conditions because poor capture conditions can produce patterns that are not useful for moisture investigation.

Does a thermal anomaly mean the insulation is wet?

Not by itself. Thermal patterns are interpreted with roof construction, visual conditions, weather, leak history, and verification evidence before any moisture conclusion is made.

Would another non-destructive screening method strengthen or challenge the thermal result?

When compatible with the assembly, impedance or capacitance screening can add a second evidence layer and help determine where more definitive verification is worthwhile.

Where should physical verification be performed to answer the moisture question with the least unnecessary disruption?

Suspected patterns, roof construction, visual conditions, and screening results are used to choose representative verification locations instead of random cuts.

Where are the suspected moisture-related areas, and how much roof do they represent?

Scan™ maps investigation areas spatially so ownership can understand extent and location while keeping suspected areas separate from verified moisture-remediation quantities.

What can this survey not prove on its own?

The report states capture conditions, roof/material limitations, screening constraints, and verification needs so a useful indicator is never presented as certainty it does not support.