Raw imagery is not the same as an owner deliverable
Thousands of source photographs may support processing, but owners usually need curated imagery, orthomosaics, thermal products, models, annotations, and reports tied to the project.
Keep processed outputs connected to the Roof Section
File names, project IDs, dates, and deliverable types should make it obvious which building and inspection the data belongs to. That prevents good data from becoming an orphaned folder.
Plan for access after the project
Decide whether the owner needs web viewers, downloadable files, PDF exports, model formats, GeoJSON, images, or archive access. Some formats are useful only with specialized software.
Practical owner checklist
- List expected deliverables in the proposal.
- Use consistent project and Roof Section naming.
- Separate raw, processed, QA-approved, and published outputs.
- Confirm the owner can open the delivered formats.
Frequently asked questions
Should the owner receive every raw file?
That depends on scope and storage policy. Raw files can be large and may not be useful to most owners, while processed and approved outputs should be clearly delivered.
Why keep project IDs in file names?
Unique IDs reduce confusion when properties have similar names or repeat inspections over many years.